A high-major Division I basketball player with four seasons logged across three programs, every one of them played under continuous physician-imposed restriction, and a fifth-year waiver appeal that the prior institution filed twice without ever invoking the rule that fit the facts. We rebuilt the waiver from the bylaw down and filed it inside the appeal window.
Marcus suffered a catastrophic medical emergency at the first sanctioned team activity of his Division I career. Program medical staff resuscitated him on site. He underwent surgery the following month at a national medical center. He missed the first sixteen games of his freshman season.
When he returned, he played under continuous physician-mandated minutes restrictions, and he competed at every subsequent program under the same restriction. Across four seasons at three Division I institutions, he never had a single season of unrestricted competition.
His most recent program of record filed a hardship waiver on his behalf. The NCAA denied it. The program filed an appeal. The NCAA denied that too. Each submission went in without outside counsel, without authorization from the athlete or his advisors, and without ever invoking NCAA Bylaw 12.6.4.1.1, the extraordinary-circumstances safety valve that fit his record line for line. The denial rationale specifically faulted the institution for filing the appeal with no new information.
The thirty-day window to file a renewed appeal was open and closing fast when his advisors reached us.
We moved on a compressed timeline. We re-read the medical record, the institutional submissions, and the NCAA's denial letters against each other in a single pass. We coordinated with the athlete's new submitting institution so the renewed appeal would go in under their letterhead with our firm as outside counsel of record, rebuilt the waiver from the bylaw down, and invoked Bylaw 12.6.4.1.1 directly.
We presented the extraordinary-circumstances framework the prior institution never named. We pulled in the underlying clinical chronology, the contemporaneous documentation across multiple programs and a national medical center, and the comparative federal authority on individualized medical review of catastrophic athletic events. We drafted the legal argument, the medical narrative, and the institutional cover memorandum. We coordinated with treating physicians on the supporting clinical declaration, filed inside the appeal window, and preserved the litigation posture in the event the renewed waiver is denied.
"He has never had a season of normal competition. The rule was written for the case in front of you. Apply it."
— Submission Language, Renewed Waiver Appeal
Most engagements are flat fee, quoted before the work begins — and most matters resolve without litigation. Start with a free consultation.