Case StudyMulti-Team Ownership GroupRebrand

One Owner.
Five Teams.

Five Different Portfolios.

A multi-team ownership group with five properties across three sports, five separately built trademark portfolios, a rebrand initiative rolling out over eighteen months, and one legal team trying to hold the timing together. We consolidated the portfolios and rebuilt the rollout order.

Scroll
ClientMulti-Team Ownership Group
Scale5 Properties · 3 Sports
EngagementPortfolio Consolidation + Rollout Sequencing
Timeline18-Month Rebrand, Launched On Schedule
This study is a composite drawn from the types of matters the firm handles. Names, locations, and identifying details are illustrative and do not depict any single client.
The Situation

One Brand Architecture.
Five Portfolios

That Did Not Agree.

The rollout window ran eighteen months across licensing, retail, broadcast, and in-venue signage cycles. The five portfolios overlapped in classes and covered different classes in different jurisdictions. Two properties had opposition proceedings pending against portfolio marks. Three had unrecorded assignments from prior owners.

The rebrand team had begun ordering physical assets before the trademark posture was clean.

The Work · Five Portfolios, Sequenced Into One Rollout
Our Approach

Map The End State.
Reverse-Map Every Portfolio.

Sequence The Launch.

We built a single portfolio architecture document that mapped the target end state, then reverse-mapped every property's current portfolio against it. We resolved the two pending oppositions, recorded the assignments through prior owners, filed new applications to cover the shared owner mark across all five properties' jurisdictions, and sequenced the rollout so each property's public brand launch followed its trademark posture, not the other way around.

We rewrote the licensing paper across the group so the shared owner mark was licensed to each property under a common template.

We coordinated with the group's outside brand agency, retail merchandise vendor, and broadcast partner so physical asset production and public brand launch aligned with the trademark clearance calendar. The rebrand launched on schedule with the portfolios consolidated.

The Outcome · By The Numbers
5
Properties Across Three Sports, Consolidated Under One Architecture
2
Pending Oppositions Resolved
3
Properties With Unrecorded Assignments, Now Recorded
18 mo
Rollout Window Sequenced Against Trademark Clearance
1
Group Licensing Template Replacing Five Separate Agreements
On Schedule
Public Rebrand Launch Across All Five Properties

"Five portfolios. One brand. Brandon got them to point in the same direction on the day we needed it."

— General Counsel, Multi-Team Ownership Group
Why It Matters

Physical Production
Moves Faster Than

Trademark Clearance. Sequence It.

A rebrand across multiple properties creates pressure to move on marketing timelines, retail production runs, and broadcast integration deadlines, all of which are indifferent to whether the underlying trademark posture is actually clean. Ordering signage and merchandise before resolving a pending opposition is how a rebrand launch turns into a rebrand recall.

Five portfolios built independently over a decade of separate acquisitions will not naturally align into one architecture. Someone has to map the end state first and then check every existing asset against it, rather than trying to reconcile five portfolios in the middle of a launch.

We consolidate multi-property trademark portfolios ahead of rebrands and acquisitions, and we build the rollout sequence so physical production always follows trademark clearance, not the other way around.

The Resolution · One Brand, Live Across Five Properties

Facing Something
Similar?

Most engagements are flat fee, quoted before the work begins — and most matters resolve without litigation. Start with a free consultation.